Board logo

標題: [Econ] 想問四題mc唔該 [打印本頁]

作者: momo3000    時間: 2010-3-18 10:57 PM     標題: 想問四題mc唔該

[localimg=400,214]4[/localimg][attach]24954[/attach][attach]24955[/attach][attach]24956[/attach]32:a 25:a 39:B 30:C 唔該師兄解一解
作者: notme    時間: 2010-3-18 11:42 PM

9932 unemployment rate=unemployed population/labour force
D foreign labour 走左 labour force decrease
unemployed population remian
%decrease in labour force>%decrease in U.P
所以係A

[ 本帖最後由 notme 於 2010-3-18 11:44 PM 編輯 ]
作者: DA6182@88C    時間: 2010-3-19 12:13 AM

99/25:
其實都幾淺下~
如果名義國民生產總值上升10%, 同埋人口下降10%, 即係人均名義國民生產總值上升22.2%~
因為(1+10%)/(1-10%) - 1 = 0.222~
實質國民生產改變=(1+10%) * 100/(1+5%)
                        =+4.76%
人均實質國民生產總值改變=[(1+4.76%)/(1-10%) - 1]*100%
                                    =16.4%~
即係人均實質國民生產總值上升16.4%~
所以答案係A~

99/39:
儲蓄戶口內既$3000係包響定義2同定義3~
如果匯做美元既話呢$3000已經唔響香港既銀行體系,
會從定義2同定義3減番$3000~
而定義1就無郁過, 所以答案係B~
作者: felixtangc    時間: 2010-3-19 07:32 PM

我冇中文版所以用住英文先,,,希望你唔好介意
1999/CE/II/30
Under which of the following circumstances will the per capita real GNP understate
the living standard?
A. when the construction industry causes noise pollution
B. when there is an increase in population due to immigration
C. when Mrs Lam does the housework by herself instead of employing a
servant
D. when there is inflation

A錯,,,因為pollution 對living standard有負面影響,,,但係呢樣冇計落GNP,,,所以係overstate(誇大)左living standard
B錯,,,因為而家已經係per capita GNP(人均GNP),,,人口影響已經計左入去
C正確,,,因為做家務係production,,,但係冇計落GNP,,,即係計少左,,,所以係understate(報細)左living standard
D錯,,,因為而家已經係real GNP(實際GNP),,,通漲影響已經計左入去
作者: momo3000    時間: 2010-3-22 02:21 PM

明白哂  多謝咁多位




歡迎光臨 小卒資訊論壇 (http://lsforum.net/board/) Powered by Discuz! 6.0.0