小卒資訊論壇 - Powered by Discuz! Board

標題: [Econ] Credit money [打印本頁]

作者: 1economist 時間: 2015-6-1 09:44 PM 標題: Credit money

請問 Credit money 中, face value is larger than intrinsic value 這句說話點解呢 ?

Thank you very much !!!!

作者: andylai 時間: 2015-6-2 12:26 AM

引用:

原帖由 1economist 於 2015-6-1 09:44 PM 發表
請問 Credit money 中, face value is larger than intrinsic value 這句說話點解呢 ?

Thank you very much !!!!

1. Actually, I don't understand what you say.

2. To me, Money do not have intrinsic value!!!

3. The value of money is support by purchasing power!!!

4. The face value of money = the value printed on the money or more precise, the nominal value of the money stated by the issuer.

Thank you.

作者: williamEX 時間: 2015-6-2 12:52 PM

是咁的你考慮做硬幣時
硬幣當中所使用的金屬都係有價有市
但係個硬幣本身所標明價值就高於其實際使用的金屬
用廣東話來講
個五蚊銀的價值(五蚊)係高於用來製做呢個五蚊的金屬價值

face value is larger than intrinsic valueintrinsic value

作者: synthk 時間: 2015-6-2 09:19 PM

引用:

原帖由 andylai 於 2015-6-2 12:26 AM 發表

1. Actually, I don't understand what you are saying.

2. To me, currency/cash does not have intrinsic value!!!

3. The actual value of money is supported by its purchasing power!!!

4. The face value of money = the value printed on the money or to be more precise, the nominal value of the money stated by the issuer.

執你英文，垃圾補習佬
做得econ補習都夠膽講 money does not have intrinsic value

答返樓主，我地睇返唔同種類錢既例子就可以好易明佢地定義既分別
例如話 credit money/fiat money,
intrinsic value < face value (iv < fv) -- $1000 banknotes
整一千蚊銀紙既成本(iv)冇理由貴過佢既面值，一千蚊(fv)，
佢本身係極低價值既紙，墨同防偽技術/物料，等等
但係佢可以買到市場上價值1000蚊既貨品。(purchasing power = fv > iv)
可見: the face value of a $1000 banknote is larger than its intrinsic value.

[ 本帖最後由 synthk 於 2015-6-2 09:21 PM 編輯 ]

歡迎光臨小卒資訊論壇 (http://lsforum.net/board/)