本區搜索:
Yahoo!字典
打印

[Econ] 關於有限合夥人退出既問題

[隱藏]

關於有限合夥人退出既問題

請問有限合夥人退出/死亡會影響該合夥結業嗎?


麻煩各位有讀經濟既高人解答我>_<唔該..
   

TOP

好似係會
佢同sole proxxxxxx一樣
limited company(有限公司)就唔會

有錯請指出
脫節了..........

TOP

好似係唔會既
limited partner佢走左partnership still can run

冇記錯的話就係咁

TOP

回覆 #1 SW!NG 的帖子

the death of limited partner 係唔會影響partnership o既continuity
但係有一點要記,,,就係limited partner 唔可以withdraw from partnership (佢自己無權退出,,,除非general partner踢佢走)
有一年mc就係咁fake人
詳情請睇http://hk.knowledge.yahoo.com/question/question?qid=7008041901216

TOP

唔會影響

TOP

引用:
原帖由 felixtangc 於 2010-2-28 06:01 PM 發表
the death of limited partner 係唔會影響partnership o既continuity
但係有一點要記,,,就係limited partner 唔可以withdraw from partnership (佢自己無權退出,,,除非general partner踢佢走)
有一年mc就係咁 ...
關於依題既mc我之前睇左joint us solution

佢解釋D既錯誤係講:

「在任何形式的合夥下,任何一個合夥人退股/死亡,一定會令現有的合夥解散」

佢既意思係指有限合夥人退股/死亡都會解散該合夥?定我誤解左佢當中既意思?


另外我想問..有限合夥人希望退出而亦得到所有合夥人既同意..係咪可以退出?
如果佢退出該合夥會唔會因此而解散呢?

[ 本帖最後由 SW!NG 於 2010-2-28 08:03 PM 編輯 ]

TOP

會!!
我有讀account都話會

TOP

會..

TOP

睇有幾多個有限合夥人
多於2個,1個死唔會
得1個,死左,有限合夥結束,(因為冇晒有限合夥人,自然唔會係有限合夥)

[ 本帖最後由 去到未來 於 2010-3-1 12:02 AM 編輯 ]

TOP

一定會.. 合夥人其中一個退出...合夥既關係都要解散

TOP

會.

TOP

到底我信邊邊至岩..help

TOP

SW!NG:
你可以check番依條,答案係c
附件: 您所在的用戶組無法下載或查看附件

TOP

回覆 #12 SW!NG 的帖子

再睇番,,,發現原來仲有一個fake 人位

先講番basic concept:
limited partner 要有investment,,,但係冇權管理 (no right to manage the company)
limited partner可以死,,,可以破產,,,但係唔比退出(no right to withdraw from the partnership)
以上兩句唔好問點解,,,背就得喇,,,因為係business law,,,背後o既法律精神CE唔需要知

如果有2個或以上o既limited partners,,,1個o既死或破產唔會影響有限合伙延續性(death or bankruptcy of a limited partner will NOT bring the LIMITED partnership to an end),,,因為仲有其他limited partners
但係,,,"去到未來"o係9樓講得o岩...最fake 人o既就係如果得一個limited partner,,,佢死左或者破產,,,就會導致有限合伙結束(因為冇晒limited partner),,,公司由 limited partnership 變成 general partnership (i.e. 變做另一間公司)

睇番2003 Q21
Alex, Angie and bonnie formed a limited partnership with Alex as the ONLY limited partner. Which of the following is correct?
A. Alex should have a smaller share of the profit while Angie and bonnie should have an equal share of the profit.
B. Bonnie and Angie invested an equal amount of money in the partnership
C. Only Bonnie and Angie have the right to manage the partnership.
D. Alex's withdrawal would not bring the partnership to an end.
Option D 錯o既原因有兩個:
1)根本唔比withdraw,,,講乜都係廢話
2)即使Alex真係離開左(due to death or bankruptcy),,,the partnership (= the limited partnership) WILL end,,,or say, shift from limited partnership to general partnership (i.e. turn into a new company)

再睇 1997 Q17
Amy, Betty and Carl form a limited partnership with Amy being the limited partner. Which of the following is true?
A. Betty enjoys limited liability.
B. They have to share the profit equally.
C. Amy is not allowed to participate in the management of the partnership.
D. The death of Amy will bring the partnership to an end.
呢條就fake人喇...因為冇講Amy 係咪唯一一個limited partner!!!
所以Option D 錯,,,因為無法判定
如果條題目係話: ...with Amy being the ONLY limited partner,,,咁option D 就o岩~

再問,,,咁"limited partner得到所有合夥人既同意..係咪可以退出?"
呢層真係唔知,,,不過我亦非常相信EAA唔會出d咁複雜既問題(你睇番歷年pp,,,最難就係上面o個兩題 )
你考完晒得閒先問老師啦...
不過即使可以咁樣退出,,,"該合夥會唔會因此而解散"都要用番limited partner人數黎判定

最後講joint-us
Joint-us explanation on 2003 Q21 Option D:「在任何形式的合夥下,任何一個合夥人退股/死亡,一定會令現有的合夥解散」
睇落o岩唔晒又錯唔晒
佢衰就衰在"任何"呢兩個字...太模糊,,,嚴格黎講可以話錯
總之你睇番上面o既解釋好過啦
好! 就係咁! 講完
仲有個幾月可以努力,,,祝各位10考生econ成功!

p.s. 我打左n咁耐,,,各位認唔認同都回下啦

[ 本帖最後由 felixtangc 於 2010-3-1 07:47 PM 編輯 ]

TOP

會   退or死   partneship都會  dissolve    佢地可以選擇reorganize  去form  另一個  新firm

TOP

重要聲明:小卒資訊論壇 是一個公開的學術交流及分享平台。 論壇內所有檔案及內容 都只可作學術交流之用,絕不能用商業用途。 所有會員均須對自己所發表的言論而引起的法律責任負責(包括上傳檔案或連結), 本壇並不擔保該等資料之準確性及可靠性,且概不會就因有關資料之任何不確或遺漏而引致之任何損失或 損害承擔任何責任(不論是否與侵權行為、訂立契約或其他方面有關 ) 。