本區搜索:
Yahoo!字典
打印

[學科討論] (ENGG1001)等我話你知Engineering是什麼

[隱藏]
將所讀的每日都帶着使命感去上堂, 偉大的工程師就係咁樣被慢慢孕育出來。
人人為我 , 我為人人

收 文達/ Longman   LS  QB/ Solution (中英均可)

TOP

真係唔講唔會知, 多謝樓主。真係而家望道便知天地寬,中學所學的知識 也實在太渺小了。

TOP

引用:
原帖由 適者生存 於 2012-7-6 09:27 發表
都岩既,如果想享受U life,真係唔好揀engine(神人除外...
我諗真係hea一日都唔惦,每完一個lecture就要即刻清concept,想豐富知識就應該走去睇多d書,邊有得成日走去玩
唔係呀嘛?我重諗住享受U life添。我Band A放晒engine。
HKU BBA(IS) class of 2015
ACM-ICPC team "IT Genius"

TOP

引用:
原帖由 miklcct 於 2012-7-6 01:48 PM 發表


唔係呀嘛?我重諗住享受U life添。我Band A放晒engine。
要好識規劃自己既生活先得,無論玩定讀書都要分秒必爭
真正令人敬佩的不是天之驕子, 而是努力對抗命運, 不斷向上的弱者.

TOP

Science is to explain and explore our nature, whereas Engineering is to design and build any artificial entities (such as structures, systems, and processes).
引用:
原帖由 適者生存 於 2012-7-6 11:56 AM 發表 將工程當做一種使命其實都唔錯,使命感應該唔低得過醫生、律師無左工程,我地今日所見既大部份野都唔會出現

TOP

引用:
原帖由 kcleung 於 2012-7-6 10:00 PM 發表 Science is to explain and explore our nature, whereas Engineering is to design and build any artificial entities (such as structures, systems, and processes).
I‘m curious on why you emphasize that engine is going to create some artificial entities.
Just my sense,it seems you want to remind me that engine sometimes can be a countwer-productive or wrong approach in improving our world.
Never should engineers forget human‘s close relation with nature.
真正令人敬佩的不是天之驕子, 而是努力對抗命運, 不斷向上的弱者.

TOP

引用:
原帖由 Automaton 於 2012-5-10 07:59 PM 發表
CS之後,到hardware

Electronic Engineering 讀什麼
Electronic Engineering
= Applied Phy - Mech Civil
= EM + Optics + Solid State + Quantum
講下RAM, ROM
RAM人人都識講個名, 但知道如何運作的有多少 ...
除左EEPROM,以前好似仲有一種,粒IC上面,有個窗口,要用UV去照黎ERASE的

TOP

No, you have misinterpreted of WHAT I have said.

My point is that the design, creation, develop, and analyze any artificial entities fall into the fields of Engineering.  This means that its application spans in ALL aspects of life, from the electricity generation, bridges and buildings, transportation, development of electronic products and systems (including information processing of the banking systems), medical support, and so on.  Thus, one cannot imagine what we can do in our lives without Engineering.  Of course, any proper use of any deliverables generated from the applications of Engineering principle would benefit the society as a whole.

Yet, I would like to emphasize that Engineering is very important to the modern world, but, at the same time, the contributions from other disciplines should NOT be belittled as well.  For example, the theories developed or observed in Science can help for the development of new drugs so as to cure diseases for medical uses.  Without such fundamentals, no new Engineering theories can be built and thus no new drugs can then be developed.  That is, Science offers the bulding blocks so that new entities can be created and developed by the applications of such theories.  The concepts of electricity have been developed in Physics and Chemistry.  Based on these concepts, a new set of theories (including the very fundamental ones in circuits and systems) were devised for power generation, transmission, and distribution so that the power grid has been developed to deliver electricity to people anytime and virtually anywhere.

Besides, the development of explosives (via the observations and theories in Science) can do help to our society, but they can do harm or destruct the society by producing weapons to invade other countries and kill people as well.  The latter may fall into the misuses/abuses of technologies, that is NOT an issue within Engineering, but human beings themselves.  How to avoid this from happening?  Education: develop one's personal values on the eyes for contributing to the society rather than doing things good to oneself (selfishness) -- falling into the fields of social science education!!!

To conclude, Engineering is critical to human lives in the modern world.  Thus, I oppose anyone to belittle the importance of Engineering, but, at the same time, I do not support anyone to belittle other disciplines as well.  Note that our modern society is contributed from all walks of lives, NOT just people from a certain discipline.
引用:
原帖由 適者生存 於 2012-7-6 10:45 PM 發表
I‘m curious on why you emphasize that engine is going to create some artificial entities.
Just my sense,it seems you want to remind me that engine sometimes can be a countwer-productive or wrong ap ...

TOP

引用:
原帖由 適者生存 於 2012-7-6 11:56 發表
將工程當做一種使命其實都唔錯,使命感應該唔低得過醫生、律師
無左工程,我地今日所見既大部份野都唔會出現
好的,行行出狀元嘛~
THANKS~
「眼見自己身處既地方愈沉淪,仲仍然可以處於一個超級政治潔癖既心態下反抗。究竟呢班豬豬幾時先明白香港政治有幾咁Dirty?幾時先知道班政棍根本唔係我地同路人?幾時先知抗爭要既唔係做比人睇,係要贏?」

TOP

引用:
原帖由 kcleung 於 2012-7-6 11:58 PM 發表
No, you have misinterpreted of WHAT I have said.

My point is that the design, creation, develop, and analyze any artificial entities fall into the fields of Engineering.  This means that its applic ...
Well, I get your point and I totally agree that we shouldn't ignore other learning area, especially, engineering and science is in one set, both of which are essential and irreplaceable
But still, it's quite strange that you say these things here....
anyway, you're such a knowledgable person that you can clearly justify yourself within a very clear logic flow
真正令人敬佩的不是天之驕子, 而是努力對抗命運, 不斷向上的弱者.

TOP

估唔到ELECTRONIC ENG同COMPUTER ENG都接觸到quantum
有D後悔冇放CE落band A

TOP

引用:
原帖由 pic5starstar 於 2012-7-6 11:27 AM 發表

你讀邊間大學呀?
city
引用:
原帖由 適者生存 於 2012-7-6 11:56 AM 發表
[img]http://lsforum.net/board/images/smilies/default/.gif[/img]將工程當做一種使命其實都唔錯,使命感應該唔低得過醫生、律師
無左工程,我地今日所見既大部份野都唔會出現
個人認為,論專業資格工程師跟律師、醫生、會計師等是相等的

TOP

其實咁多個engine,我對chemical engineering比較有興趣。
樓主介唔介意介紹下?

TOP

化工非化學
想讀最純的chem當然是入化學系
一般而言化工較多Physics, 數
ChemENG的chem也沒有化學系那麼詳細, 因為大家重點不同

Chem Eng = Reaction Control, Process Control, Transport Control等等
反應的環境, 反應物的流動, 反應過程的控制( 速度的控制, 流量的控制, 熱力學控制, yield的控制等等...)

2個key term : Mass Transfer & Heat Transfer
即 Mixing, Separation, Extraction, Distillation, evaporation, condensation, filtration, absorption, adsorption, Liquefaction, 等等
的"Physics"& "Engineering"
Thermodynamics, ThermoFluid, 白努力定律 等等一定有

老實講, 我對Chem Eng認識不多, 也沒什麼接觸 (我不是UST)
(想知得更清楚就自己去買/借本 Mass & Heat Transfer書)
------------------
回WingG
City的EE的Prof很多都是ieee fellow
(什麼是IEEE Fellow ?自己去Google)
簡單講, CityU的EE部門 師資是很很強
可惜, 這一件事門外漢鬼知
(本人非CityU)

[ 本帖最後由 Automaton 於 2012-7-8 08:00 PM 編輯 ]

TOP

回覆 89# kaica 的帖子

Chem engine is good ! HAHA...First ...I ask you a question...
You want to study chemical engineering....in macroscopic level or microscopic level ( i.e. atomic level ) ?

TOP

重要聲明:小卒資訊論壇 是一個公開的學術交流及分享平台。 論壇內所有檔案及內容 都只可作學術交流之用,絕不能用商業用途。 所有會員均須對自己所發表的言論而引起的法律責任負責(包括上傳檔案或連結), 本壇並不擔保該等資料之準確性及可靠性,且概不會就因有關資料之任何不確或遺漏而引致之任何損失或 損害承擔任何責任(不論是否與侵權行為、訂立契約或其他方面有關 ) 。