¥»°Ï·j¯Á:
Yahoo!¦r¨å

§ë²¼¶µ¥Ø ( ¦h¿ï: ³Ì¦h¥i¿ï 2 ¶µ ) °Ñ»P¤H¼Æ 245

1. MC ©ö¹L¤W¦~(¤£¥i¯à§a)
 

12 (2.83%)

2. MC ¦P¤W¦~¤@¼Ë
 

14 (3.30%)

3. MC Ãø¹L¤W¦~
 

210 (49.53%)

4. LQ Ãø¹L¤W¦~
 

87 (20.52%)

5. LQ ¦P¤W¦~¤@¼Ë
 

51 (12.03%)

6. LQ ©ö¹L¤W¦~
 

50 (11.79%)

¥´¦L

[Core] ä»𠰴¹´mathsæ¯𥪯�å¹´é𧙗��?

ä»𠰴¹´mathsæ¯𥪯�å¹´é𧙗��?

½Ð­ø¦n¶Ã§ë  ·Q¦ô¤U±øCURVEÅÜ´X¦h
   

TOP

I downloaded paper 2 and had a look.

I don't understand why so many people think the MCs are difficult.
Many past CE paper 2 questions were harder.

TOP

[ÁôÂÃ]
¤Þ¥Î:
­ì©«¥Ñ ®ç¤l ©ó 2013-4-16 11:11 PM µoªí
I downloaded paper 2 and had a look.

I don't understand why so many people think the MCs are difficult.
Many past CE paper 2 questions were harder.
À³¸Ó«Y¦]¬°¤W¦~¸û©ö,¤µ¦~Ãø¥ª¤p¤p´Nı±o¬Û¹ï¤WÃø

TOP

§Úı±o¨ä¹ê±øcurve ­ø·|Åܱo´X¦h,­øºâ¯u«Y¯S§OÃø/¯S§O©ö¬J¡C

TOP

Here is my conclusion:Comparing to 2012 DSE,
Paper 1: Much easier
Paper 2: Slightly more difficult

Overall: Easier because Paper 1 accounts for more in terms of overall mark.

[ ¥»©«³Ì«á¥Ñ Cider321 ©ó 2013-4-18 06:43 PM ½s¿è ]
2012 HKDSE

TOP

¦^ÂÐ 49# Cider321 ªº©«¤l

Ãø©ö­ø«Y§A¦P§Ú­q
¤é®Õ¥Í¦P¸É²ß¤Ñ¤ý­Ì³£¸ÜÃø¥ª
¶^ªº¾÷·|»á¤j

TOP

¸É²ß¤Ñ¤ý¸ÜÃø¥ª??
Really???

TOP

¦^ÂÐ 51# st00141062002 ªº©«¤l

Ú»koopa¦Pherman yeung FB
koopa¬Æ¦Üpredict¤µ¦~curve'would be quite low'
­ø¦P·N¥i¨ìFB challenge koopa

TOP

¦^ÂÐ 52# anthonychan5105 ªº©«¤l

¤£¬O­ø¦P·N
¥u«Y¨Dµª®×©j

TOP

¦^ÂÐ 52# anthonychan5105 ªº©«¤l

§A¦ü«ô¤Ñ¤ý«ô¨ì¶Ì¥ªªGd¤H...
¤Ö¦~¡A§A¤Ó¦~»´¤F

TOP

¦^ÂÐ 54# godofeng ªº©«¤l

µL¸Ü«ô­ø«ô
¨C¥÷¨÷Á`¦³¤Hı²`ı²L
­«ÂI¥u«Ycurve°ª©w§C
¤H¦a¦³µfËݤW¤U±M·~µ´¹ï¦³¨ä°Ñ¦Ò»ù­È
¤£¬O¶Ü?

TOP

¾ãÅéÃø¥ª

TOP

­Ó¼ÐÃDÅܮͶýXge

TOP

­«­nÁn©ú:¤p¨ò¸ê°T½×¾Â ¬O¤@­Ó¤½¶}ªº¾Ç³N¥æ¬y¤Î¤À¨É¥­¥x¡C ½×¾Â¤º©Ò¦³ÀɮפΤº®e ³£¥u¥i§@¾Ç³N¥æ¬y¤§¥Î¡Aµ´¤£¯à¥Î°Ó·~¥Î³~¡C ©Ò¦³·|­û§¡¶·¹ï¦Û¤v©Òµoªíªº¨¥½×¦Ó¤Þ°_ªºªk«ß³d¥ô­t³d(¥]¬A¤W¶ÇÀɮשγsµ²)¡A ¥»¾Â¨Ã¤£¾á«O¸Óµ¥¸ê®Æ¤§·Ç½T©Ê¤Î¥i¾a©Ê¡A¥B·§¤£·|´N¦]¦³Ãö¸ê®Æ¤§¥ô¦ó¤£½T©Î¿òº|¦Ó¤Þ­P¤§¥ô¦ó·l¥¢©Î ·l®`©Ó¾á¥ô¦ó³d¥ô(¤£½×¬O§_»P«IÅv¦æ¬°¡B­q¥ß«´¬ù©Î¨ä¥L¤è­±¦³Ãö ) ¡C