本區搜索:
Yahoo!字典
打印

[Econ] 如ECON有難題請內進留言(希望大家有個好o既Econ成績)

[隱藏]

如ECON有難題請內進留言(希望大家有個好o既Econ成績)

I will ans Econ questions as much as I can, hope it will help u. Please try to ask your question before 2/5 as I WONT ANSWER ANY QUESTION AFTER THAT( cuz I will be a tutor during summer).

P.S. Plz give me an real question or example cuz its hard to explain the general theory in here, thx.

[ 本帖最後由 petergarylee 於 2015-4-29 12:47 AM 編輯 ]
   

TOP

試從兩方面比較CPI同GDP deflator A)開支權數B)評估生活費用上升對住戶的影響的準確度

[ 本帖最後由 Ray159357 於 2015-4-24 01:42 PM 編輯 ]

TOP

回覆 2# Ray159357 的帖子

B)CPI is a price index which only measures the prices of consumption goods and services. GDP deflator is a price index of the prices of all items in GDP, which includes C, I, G and NX. If we compare two of the price index, we can find out that the accuracy of CPI to estimate the effect of an increase in living cost to household(private sector) is higher than GDP deflator. It is because 1) CPI focus on consumer's expenditure, which directly reflect how the household will be affected by a change in general price level. 2) GDP deflator is a broader price index includes too much other factors( investment, export...) , where those factors won't  immediately affect the general price level but can reflect the macro-economics change in the country. 3)(OUT OF SYLLABUS) GDP deflator only calculate every quarter and with a time lag, it is unsuitable for timely estimation of inflation, which means it can't reflect the effect of an increase in living cost immediately, thus it has a lower accuracy.

For A) , can you give me the English of 開支權數?

TOP

回覆 3# petergarylee 的帖子

weighted expenditure? i guess

TOP

回覆 4# Ray159357 的帖子

Sorry, I really dont understand the question, can you form another complete sentence in English to elaborate your question again?

TOP

Mr Lee is a private medical doctor. He wants to expand his business. He can
raise funds by
(1) borrowing from banks.
(2) inviting partners to form a general partnership.
(3) forming a private limited company and issuing shares.
A. (1) and (2) only
B. (1) and (3) only
C. (2) and (3) only
D. (1), (2) and (3)
請問點解(3)都錯?  private limited company不是可以issue shares 給家人和朋友嗎?

TOP

回覆 6# kenny1545 的帖子

Mr Lee can form a private limited company but the company cant 'issue shares' as there is not legal market for him to 'issue' the shares of the company. I think the problem is on the verb 'issue' , where you can transfer the shares of the private limited company, but it is not 'issue', where 'issue' may has a meaning of 'offer the shares to the general public', which clash with the restriction of private limited company. In chinese, 'issue' has the meaning of '發行'.

[ 本帖最後由 petergarylee 於 2015-4-25 07:29 AM 編輯 ]

TOP

Hi, may I ask u an econ question?

A severe nuclear leakage occured in Japan in 2011. Explain how his would affect the opportunity cost of using nuclear power.

TOP

CPI,GDP deflator 過100系唔系就系inflation,定系要比較舊年,increase rate

TOP

回覆 8# dontaskme 的帖子

Form my understanding, a severe nuclear leakage increase the opportunity cost of using nuclear power in different way( electricity generation, weapon...). It is because the nuclear leakage crisis increase the experimental risk of using nuclear power, which the potential/real cost(destruction caused by the nuclear leakage) of using nuclear power increase, the value of using nuclear power decreased, thus the value/cost(price) of using other resources/power increase as they are more stable. Using nuclear power means you need to scarify the usage of other resources/power(the opportunity cost), when the value of them increase, the opportunity cost will increase. This is only one example, there still have a lot way to answer this question.

TOP

重要聲明:小卒資訊論壇 是一個公開的學術交流及分享平台。 論壇內所有檔案及內容 都只可作學術交流之用,絕不能用商業用途。 所有會員均須對自己所發表的言論而引起的法律責任負責(包括上傳檔案或連結), 本壇並不擔保該等資料之準確性及可靠性,且概不會就因有關資料之任何不確或遺漏而引致之任何損失或 損害承擔任何責任(不論是否與侵權行為、訂立契約或其他方面有關 ) 。