Board logo

標題: [選科諮詢] Engineering 一問 [打印本頁]

作者: ce_2010    時間: 2011-10-20 11:21 PM     標題: Engineering 一問

我想問以上3科邊科出路最好/最易揾工?
作者: winnie9217    時間: 2011-10-21 07:20 PM

3. Building Service Engineering
作者: louisyau    時間: 2011-10-22 10:57 AM

how good is it?
作者: kiyiptsang    時間: 2011-10-26 09:59 PM

引用:
原帖由 louisyau 於 2011-10-22 10:57 AM 發表
how good is it?
quite good
作者: al915    時間: 2011-10-28 09:59 PM

electronic engineering...你會讀d IT野同埋circuit(electronics)......本人讀city computer engineering
作者: 3404844    時間: 2011-10-30 04:31 PM

thz u very much
作者: Juelkihxepver    時間: 2011-10-31 08:21 PM

I wanna ask:
1. Why BSE will lead to a good future?
2. Is taking courses in BSE hard? (many maths?)
作者: sunny1992    時間: 2011-11-1 01:05 AM

本人讀bse asso
讀BSE有科叫 Basis Math,但我唔覺係basis(因為要讀
vector,
complex no.
limit  
differentiability
integration
....
有讀pure math,physis成績又唔差,入到黎就天堂
如果係無pure,我唔敢話"一定"讀得好差,但會好好好辛苦,
要係3個月讀人地4年讀ge野(A math+ pure math),最寶貴ge semA屈分時期都係做比人屈果個...
就算唔係科科都要計咁多數(其實科科都有數會用In d/dx果d),都會比math拉低gpa
我唔建議無讀數ge人讀engineering

[ 本帖最後由 sunny1992 於 2011-11-1 01:07 AM 編輯 ]
作者: roviury    時間: 2011-11-7 01:40 AM

引用:
原帖由 sunny1992 於 2011-11-1 01:05 AM 發表
本人讀bse asso
讀BSE有科叫 Basis Math,但我唔覺係basis(因為要讀
vector,
complex no.
limit  
differentiability
integration
....
有讀pure math,physis成績又唔差,入到黎就天堂
如果係無pure,我唔敢話 ...
其實叫得ENG, 都係比數既人入去讀, 起碼都要有科PHYS
除非你係CHEM, BIO個D ENG
作者: ehbb    時間: 2011-11-24 12:25 AM     標題: 回覆 7# Juelkihxepver 的帖子

你要先明白BSE是一門何許學科
當你再留意了時事
自然明白Why BSE will lead to a good future

當你了解BSE於相關行業中扮演何許角色
亦同樣會知道BSE對數學的要求
或數學於BSE中的用處
作者: kelvin886    時間: 2012-2-19 12:43 PM

我學校一位老師讀engine出身
佢自己話讀 咩都有出路
作者: integration    時間: 2012-2-19 11:38 PM

引用:
原帖由 ehbb 於 2011-11-24 12:25 AM 發表
你要先明白BSE是一門何許學科
當你再留意了時事
自然明白Why BSE will lead to a good future

當你了解BSE於相關行業中扮演何許角色
亦同樣會知道BSE對數學的要求
或數學於BSE中的用處
BSE=Building Service Engineerin?
Building Service 同math有咩關系可言
作者: jasperlam    時間: 2012-4-7 05:16 PM

機電工程唔錯呀...
係人都要用電啦  XD
保你唔會失業
作者: al915    時間: 2012-4-16 08:35 PM

ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING 係電子工程....不過入去你就會讀好多電腦硬件野
BUILDING其實同CIVIL ENGINEERING 差唔多,一定有工做
作者: e.abc57    時間: 2012-4-24 10:49 AM

論前景一定BSE > IEEM > EE
作者: kcleung    時間: 2012-4-29 06:00 PM

http://lsforum.net/board/thread-199887-1-1.html  (6#)

Both Engineering and Physics require ones to have strong background in Mathematics.  In other words, he/she MUST have very good background in Mathematics for survival.  If you are really interested in the captioned disciplines, you have to FIRST improve your proficiency in Mathematics.

Besides, ones must have passion on study for success.  Engineering students may spend around 30 hours per week in class (lectures, tutorials, and laboratories).  EEE or CE students may need to occasionally work overnights to write computer programs, build circuit boards, and so on.

Of course, one can be rewarded if he/she is really bright and studying hard.  Besides further study, he/she can receive job offers in many disciplines, including investment banks, before graduation.  Otherwise, just like many weak BBA graduates, they would fail to get any jobs long after graduation.  Some incapable / lazy (hea) students might have discontinued their study without receiving any degrees.


http://lsforum.net/board/thread-199427-2-1.html  (13#)

Just like what I have said some time ago, this can be the case.  In the worse case, study can be discontinued for some incapable students as well.

It is not easy to understand/comprehend some Engineering concepts.  They are also derived or involved lots of concepts in Mathematics as well.  Hence, Engineering is indeed a discipline in Applied Mathematics/Science.

However, one may feel excited that we may apply these Engineering concepts to build real, practical applications so as to contribute to our society.  To name a few, these applications include:
*  Electricity, engines
*  Computers
*  Internet, mobile communication, ...
*  Optical fibres
*  LED, OLED
*  High-rise buildings and bridges
*  Manufacturing production lines
*  DNA sequencing
*  Nano-technology
...
引用:
原帖由 ce_2010 於 2011-10-20 11:21 PM 發表
我想問以上3科邊科出路最好/最易揾工?

作者: kiyiptsang    時間: 2012-4-29 10:26 PM     標題: 回覆 16# kcleung 的帖子

其實maths 好physics 差 (實為冇興趣,但深知physics在硬知識上有用-.-) 是否可行?
作者: kcleung    時間: 2012-4-29 11:10 PM

Well, it depends on what part(s) in Physics you can do well and those cannot, and which Engineering programme(s) you would like to study.

For Computer Science, it requires very minimal background in Physics (logic gates and circuit theory), whereas Civil Engineering needs strong background in Mechanics (both Statics and Dynamics).  However, Engineering students are generally required a strong background in Mathematics, regardless of which programmes they study.

For the 4-Year UG programmes, Engineering students may require to take common courses in Mathematics, Science, and computer programming in the first year of study.
引用:
原帖由 kiyiptsang 於 2012-4-29 10:26 PM 發表
其實maths 好physics 差 (實為冇興趣,但深知physics在硬知識上有用-.-) 是否可行?

作者: kiyiptsang    時間: 2012-4-30 01:18 PM

那如果我只是e&m 差呢 ...
作者: kcleung    時間: 2012-4-30 01:53 PM

It depends on HOW weak E & M would be.  If you do not perform well in just this area, I think you may suffer for at most 1-2 courses among most programmes (except for Electrical Engineering stream) and should you be able to manage passing these courses, too.
引用:
原帖由 kiyiptsang 於 2012-4-30 01:18 PM 發表 那如果我只是e&m 差呢 ...

作者: clifford    時間: 2012-5-11 04:10 PM     標題: 回覆 17# kiyiptsang 的帖子

If you good at mathematics,why don't go for it?
作者: wongjack900    時間: 2012-5-25 12:55 PM

ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
作者: paper123    時間: 2012-6-13 03:13 PM

3. Building Service Engineering
作者: hpkpk123    時間: 2012-7-12 07:05 PM

Engineering既數多到同難到痴線(聽我幾個上升左Engineering後悔既FD講)
作者: stpeter    時間: 2012-7-16 09:17 AM

Building Service Engineering is the best among the three
作者: yykcw    時間: 2012-7-25 02:32 AM

引用:
原帖由 kcleung 於 2012-4-29 11:10 PM 發表
Well, it depends on what part(s) in Physics you can do well and those cannot, and which Engineering programme(s) you would like to study.

For Computer Science, it requires very minimal background i ...
如果我係相反
PHYSICS幾好但MATHS一般呢
作者: kcleung    時間: 2012-7-25 03:58 PM

You may need to think about WHY Physics is OK but Mathematics is NOT.  Normally, you need to do lots of computations for solving Physics problems, and thus, the performance in Physics should somewhat positively correlate to that in Mathematics.

One may not survive if the proficiency in mathematics is unsatisfactory, but he/she may survive in certain disciplines in Engineering, say, CS, if he/she is unsatisfactory in Physics.  In all cases, he/she must be good in Mathematics.
引用:
原帖由 yykcw 於 2012-7-25 02:32 AM 發表 如果我係相反PHYSICS幾好但MATHS一般呢
[ 本帖最後由 kcleung 於 2012-7-26 12:00 PM 編輯 ]
作者: speedmanron    時間: 2012-8-4 11:25 PM

BUILDING SERVICE多機會留在港工作同考工程師牌
而electronic eng多在內地工廠工作 不太需要考工程師牌
作者: agz    時間: 2012-8-15 06:59 PM

其實Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 呢一科係讀咩野?
作者: cindy1995    時間: 2012-8-20 06:20 PM

I think Building Service Engineering
作者: hk1989    時間: 2012-10-29 09:27 PM

引用:
原帖由 agz 於 2012-8-15 06:59 PM 發表
其實Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 呢一科係讀咩野?
quality control, optimization, operation e.t.c.
作者: 適者生存    時間: 2012-11-13 08:38 PM

引用:
原帖由 hk1989 於 2012-10-29 09:27 PM 發表

quality control, optimization, operation e.t.c.
optimization不是科科engine都有的嗎?
作者: tckjack    時間: 2012-11-13 10:21 PM

CU   CS
作者: coffeeyan480    時間: 2013-1-12 02:10 PM

C. but u have to ensure u ar gd at maths and phy! if not, it's a nightmare
作者: BE145    時間: 2013-2-10 12:00 AM

2. Electronic Engineering <---- 有呢科讀咩? =_=''




歡迎光臨 小卒資訊論壇 (http://lsforum.net/board/) Powered by Discuz! 6.0.0