本區搜索:
Yahoo!字典
打印

[Eng] [2017 Reading Q48] 希望有5**高手指點一下,歡迎大家討論一下,不喜勿插。

本主題由 煎魚 於 2020-10-4 01:52 AM 移動
[隱藏]

[2017 Reading Q48] 希望有5**高手指點一下,歡迎大家討論一下,不喜勿插。

我的補習老師寫了篇文章討論DSE 2017 Reading B2. 他認為2017 B2 Q48 的答案出錯了。我覺得他的話沒錯,但又認為HKEAA無可能這麼久都沒發現自己出錯。希望有5**高手指點一下,歡迎大家討論一下,不喜勿插。

Q. 48.
According to paragraph 5...

i) Which generation was the first to adopt a child-centred approach to parenting?
Answer on the marking scheme: Baby BoomersHowever, I believe that the answer should be "parents of Baby Boomers" instead. The relevant part from the reading passage: "Howe and Strauss emphasize the emergence of the pro-child culture among Baby Boomer adults as the catalyst for this characteristic..."From a linguistics perspective, The "agent" of adopting a child-centred approach/pro-child approach is "parents of Baby Boomer/Baby Boomer adults" while the "patient" is the "Baby Boomer". The question asks for the generation that first "adopted" a child-centred approach to parenting instead of the generation that "is affected by/receive" a child-centred approach to parenting. Thus, the answer should be the "agent" instead of the "patient" of this kind of parenting. The dictionary definition for "parenting" is "the raising of children and all the responsibilities and activities that are involved in it." For parenting, the "agent" is always the parents (as the parents are the ones who raise the children and decides which parenting style (e.g. authoritative, permissive, etc.) to adopt) while the "patient" is always the child (the child is affected/acted upon by the parenting).

ii) Which generation had child bearing "foisted upon them"?
Answer on the marking scheme: parents of Baby Boomers However, I believe that the answer is definitely "parents of Baby Boomers". Instead, it can be inferred that the answer may be "generations before parents of Baby Boomers".The relevant part from the reading passage: "Parents became parents because they wanted children, not because childbearing was foisted upon them."It should be noted this sentence means that childbearing was NOT foisted upon them. The reason why parents (of Baby Boomers) gave birth to their children is that they wanted children themselves, not because they were forced to do so. If an MC question asks "Parents of Baby Boomers had child bearing foisted upon them", the answer is clearly "False". I agree that if the question asks who the pronoun "them" refers to, the answer should be "parents of Baby Boomers". However, this is not what the question is asking about.

Sorry for any typos/grammatical mistakes as I haven't proofread it. Just want to hear from you guys first.

Thanks.

[ 本帖最後由 煎魚 於 2020-10-4 02:29 AM 編輯 ]
   

TOP

既然係我發現你post 錯位, 又幫你移咗過黎, 咁我就試下答啦

Q48 係 Baby Boomers, 唔係佢哋parents.

我既理解係咁樣既:
佢話隨著 60s, 70s 年的開始有墮胎技術 (佢考你識唔識, with the emergence of widespread use of 呢一種句型 + abortion 呢個字) , [因為啲父母隨時隨地可以墮胎], 於是生得既, 都係想成為父母既. 於是就會有'pro-child approach' blablabla . 咁60-70年代可以成為父母既, 應該係baby boomers 自己, 唔係佢地 parents 喎, 文章的line 21 好清楚講咗係Baby Boomer adults (成咗年既嬰兒潮) .  

所以, 我又from the perspective of linguistics 啦, 個 adopt 既 'agent' (用返人話講, 即係 subject 啦, 深少少就叫 'doer' 啦) , 咪就正正係baby boomers 自己lor.

嬰兒潮指既係WWII 先出世的人(1945二戰完結, 佢仲怕你唔識, 特登落咗隻2號註腳, 係第3版底下) , 60-70 正正就係佢地可以生BB的年代啊!

再深入討論一下啦, 如果答案真係指 Baby Boomer 的 parents, 就一定係1945 之前做到亞爸亞媽既人, 假設佢係20歲生仔, 就係 191X / 192X 既人啦, 根據文中所言, 呢個時間都未有墮胎技術, 所以唔小心 bit 咗個B 出黎, 就局住要 (foisted upon them, line 25)  合乎文意, (但真心唔知點解考個咁深既字)  

我愚見認為, 之所以有誤會係因為對 'Baby Boomer Adult' 呢個字有少少 ambiguity (人話就係兩頭蛇, 語言偽術) , 可以解為' baby boomer 的adult' 不過, 再睇下文, 應該好快知道唔係咁解既.

利申: 我咁清楚因為我自己就係 Baby Boomers 個仔, 我親眼見到我既上上輩對我老豆老母, 同我老豆老母點對我, 係兩回事既
所以, 你唔好鬧我喎, 根據篇文講, 我呢啲 Millennial, 唔鬧得架, 要有安全網畀佢 prepare for the failure (line 85) 架!!!!

真係個人意見, 不喜勿插

[ 本帖最後由 煎魚 於 2020-10-4 02:29 AM 編輯 ]
文化本是平常事
"Culture is ordinary" by Raymond Williams
-----
https://www.meta.edu.hk
ig: metalearning

TOP

唔怪得我果邊無啦啦少左1個回覆
攪到我d#移哂位
全部table既#number都要改過
不過知版主哥哥你係一時醒唔起呢樣野
所以唔會怪你

TOP

Thx for sharing

Thx for sharing

TOP

回覆 3# Vileplume 的帖子

Oh!!!!!
我真係有點廢
下次我會識做, 十分唔好意思
你怪我啦, 你怪我啦 :'( :'(
文化本是平常事
"Culture is ordinary" by Raymond Williams
-----
https://www.meta.edu.hk
ig: metalearning

TOP

重要聲明:小卒資訊論壇 是一個公開的學術交流及分享平台。 論壇內所有檔案及內容 都只可作學術交流之用,絕不能用商業用途。 所有會員均須對自己所發表的言論而引起的法律責任負責(包括上傳檔案或連結), 本壇並不擔保該等資料之準確性及可靠性,且概不會就因有關資料之任何不確或遺漏而引致之任何損失或 損害承擔任何責任(不論是否與侵權行為、訂立契約或其他方面有關 ) 。